Moral Emotions and Risk Politics

This VIDI-project will offer a philosophical investigation of how moral emotions can be incorporated into political decision making and communication about risky technologies.

Risks arising from technologies raise important ethical issues for people living in the 21st century. Although technologies such as nanotechnology, biotechnology, ICT, and nuclear energy can improve human well-being, they may also convey risks for our well-being due to, for example, accidents and pollution. As a consequence of such side-effects, technologies can trigger emotions, including fear and indignation, which often leads to conflicts between experts and laypeople. How should we deal with such emotions in political decision making about risky technologies?

Emotions have often been met with suspicion in political debates about risky technologies, because they are seen as contrary to rational decision making. Indeed emotions can cloud our understanding of quantitative information about risks. However, as I have shown in my VENI-project, moral emotions are necessary in order to judge ethical aspects of technological risks, such as justice, fairness and autonomy.

This VIDI-project will build on my VENI-project by extending my ideas to risk politics. 1. I will develop a procedural approach for policy making such that emotional responses to technological risks, and the ethical concerns that lie behind them, are taken seriously. 2. A PhD-student will investigate the extent to which existing models for political decision making about risks can include moral emotions. 3. The manner in which risks are presented is an important factor in decision making about risks, therefore, a postdoc will develop a theoretical framework on how moral emotions should be included in risk communication.

This VIDI-project will lead to recommendations for institutional reforms, enabling morally better political decisions about risky technologies and a better understanding between experts and laypeople, by genuinely incorporating moral emotions into risk politics and risk communication.


VIDI-grant for innovational research (nr. 276-20-012) from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)

Related Scientific publications (selection)


  • Roeser, S. (Editor-in-chief), Rafaela Hillerbrand, Martin Peterson and Per Sandin (Section editors) (2012), Handbook of Risk Theory, Springer (forthcoming; >1000pp)
  • Roeser, S., "Emotional Engineers: Toward Morally Responsible Engineering", Journal of Science and Engineering Ethics (forthcoming) available online
  • Taebi, B. and W. Kastenberg. Forthcoming. Teaching engineering ethics to PhD-students: a Berkeley-Delft initiative. Science and Engineering Ethics. available online


  • Taebi, B. and S. Roeser, eds. 2015. The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice and Democracy in the post-Fukushima Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. available online


  • Taebi, B., S. Roeser and I. Van de Poel. 2012. The ethics of nuclear power: social experiments, intergenerational justice, and emotions. Energy Policy (51): 202-206. available online


  • Kaliarnta S, Nihlen-Fahlquist J, Roeser S. 2011. Emotions and Ethical Considerations of Women Undergoing IVF-Treatment. HEC Forum. 23 (4):281-93
  • Nihlen Fahlquist, J. and Roeser, S. 2011. Ethical Problems with Information on Infant Feeding in Developed Countries Public Health Ethics 4(2). DOI: 10.1093/phe/phr019.

Related Professional/Popular publications


  • Current project


Research Theme

Research Area